Actually, my commertial system is not a competitor to modern bookkeeping systems, developed by ?Sap?, ?Columbus? and ?Oracle?. I am a businessman and I developed my system as a complete COMMERCIAL STRUCTURE (real market, maximal profits, minimal losses and risks). It is absolutely independent and can be used as an addition (superstructure) to any contemporary bookkeeping system (like ones mentioned above).

There are plenty of such systems in the market, but there is no actual difference between them. They differ mostly by price and advertising (like ?Herbalife? and its analogues).
There is one important detail: neither of these systems has anything in common with REAL MARKET (real competitors, real customers, real prices etc.). And neither of them considers MOMENTOUS COMMERTIAL RISKS (such as terrorist attacks or weather cataclysms).

Programmers (including your IT-specialists) do not understand in commerce. And they do not have to. Their task is to TRANSLATE some texts to the language of a computer. They are like your INTERPRETERS to FORIEGN language. How can you trust them with composing technical requirement for the development of your corporate system??? I think, they will suggest you buying an existing bookkeeping system. Probably, they will choose the most expensive one. (Bribes may be reasons for that).
Unfortunately, ?SAP?, ?Columbus? and others are selling not an ?existing bookkeeping system?, but an UNFINISHED GOOD, which is to be smartly attached to your structure.

?Technosila? met great difficulties, having trusted the programmers with doing it. They lost 500 positions of commodity classifier, which was the foundation of corporate system. They know nothing about the market and the good, you are selling. Their thoughts are pure theory.
So finally, it was me, who had to reconstruct the commodity classifier for ?Technosila? (for money, of course). Concerning my system, the classifier was made by me also. Nevertheless, ?Technosila? continued having troubles. They couldn?t achieve the uniqueness of the items in the database and many other necessary things. They couldn?t even start the simple bookkeeping system ?Axapta? up properly. However, the advertising tells us the ?Technosila? story in bright colors (the web page is also available), the same as the successful story of Microsoft or ?Herbalife? ads. What is the real quantity of such failures? Please, don?t trust the ads.

I am sure that my Commercial system will be a perfect addition to any bookkeeping systems (like those, mentioned above), and make them competitive in the market. I am also sure that the developers themselves are unable to make their bookkeeping systems commercial. They do not have specialists of such level. They have ordinary programmers, who understand nothing in commerce. Thanks god, the market grew and the time of simple systems passed.

I keep on looking for the partner for promoting my unique commercial corporate system.

Please visit http://pavel.ubicon.ru/ or detailed comparative description of my system.

Yours respectfully, Pavel Karpov (general director and the developer of http://www.technobazar.ru/ ) (tel. 985 766 67 87)

This entry was posted on Friday, June 17th, 2005 at 10:22 pm and is filed under Aricles. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.